2004 · Week 2 · Division
FinalGiants Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 62°F · wind 16mph
Closing spread
WAS -3
Total
40
Model margin
+5.0est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
6.4%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Giants
- Commanders
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.121EPA / play-0.028
- 38.9%Success rate43.5%
- -0.102EPA / dropback-0.017
- -0.145EPA / rush-0.044
- 6.6%Explosive rate8.2%
- 31.9%Third-down rate29.5%
- 56.8%Red-zone TD rate53.1%
- 1.03Points / drive1.65
- 2.5%Turnover rate2.2%
- -0.104EPA / play allowed+0.008
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NYG lead 32–21–2 since 1999
Meetings average 40.1 points. NYG are 29-24-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | WAS–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 12:54 | 10 | 53 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 7:24 | 5 | 29 | Missed field goal | 7–0 |
| WAS | Q1 4:09 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 3:17 | 8 | 44 | Turnover on downs | 7–0 |
| WAS | Q2 14:15 | 3 | 1 | Turnover | 7–6 |
| NYG | Q2 13:01 | 1 | 38 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q2 12:53 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–7 |
| NYG | Q2 10:40 | 5 | 22 | Punt | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q2 7:56 | 3 | 6 | Opp touchdown | 7–14 |
| WAS | Q2 6:21 | 2 | 6 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| NYG | Q2 5:39 | 3 | 6 | Field goal | 7–17 |
| WAS | Q2 4:34 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 7–17 |
| NYG | Q2 3:21 | 10 | 77 | Field goal | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q2 0:37 | 2 | 22 | Missed field goal | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 55 | Turnover | 7–20 |
| NYG | Q3 9:45 | 5 | 18 | Missed field goal | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q3 7:17 | 5 | 19 | Punt | 7–20 |
| NYG | Q3 5:15 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q3 3:09 | 4 | 56 | Turnover | 7–20 |
| NYG | Q3 1:22 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q4 14:15 | 6 | 49 | Touchdown | 14–20 |
| NYG | Q4 12:01 | 0 | 0 | Turnover | 14–20 |
| WAS | Q4 11:51 | 6 | 15 | Turnover | 14–20 |
| NYG | Q4 9:59 | 5 | 14 | Punt | 14–20 |
| WAS | Q4 8:09 | 4 | 23 | Turnover | 14–20 |
| NYG | Q4 6:15 | 8 | 26 | Punt | 14–20 |
| WAS | Q4 2:11 | 4 | 6 | Turnover on downs | 14–20 |
| NYG | Q4 1:24 | 4 | 1 | Turnover on downs | 14–20 |
| WAS | Q4 0:18 | 1 | -2 | End of half | 14–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ramsey | 9/18 | 142 | 1 | 3 |
| Mark Brunell | 10/18 | 92 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Portis | 20 | 69 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Mark Brunell | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 |
| Patrick Ramsey | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Ladell Betts | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Laveranues Coles | 1 | -16 | -16.0 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurt Warner | 22/33 | 232 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 18 | 42 | 2.3 | 0 |
| Ron Dayne | 9 | 12 | 1.3 | 0 |
| Tim Carter | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Commanders.
Half-point at risk
6.43%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
62.4%
Expected total
43.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.25
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+3.70
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.01



