2004 · Week 2 · Division
FinalGiants Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 62°F · wind 16mph
Closing spread
WAS -3
Total
40
Model margin
+5.0est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
6.4%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Giants
- Commanders
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.121EPA / play-0.028
- 38.9%Success rate43.5%
- -0.102EPA / dropback-0.017
- -0.145EPA / rush-0.044
- 6.6%Explosive rate8.2%
- 31.9%Third-down rate29.5%
- 56.8%Red-zone TD rate53.1%
- 1.03Points / drive1.65
- 2.5%Turnover rate2.2%
- -0.104EPA / play allowed+0.008
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999
WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. NYG are 28-24-2 ATS in the series.
Box score
Individual performances
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ramsey | 9/18 | 142 | 1 | 3 |
| Mark Brunell | 10/18 | 92 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Portis | 20 | 69 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Mark Brunell | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 |
| Patrick Ramsey | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Ladell Betts | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Laveranues Coles | 1 | -16 | -16.0 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurt Warner | 22/33 | 232 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 18 | 42 | 2.3 | 0 |
| Ron Dayne | 9 | 12 | 1.3 | 0 |
| Tim Carter | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Commanders.
Half-point at risk
6.43%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
62.4%
Expected total
43.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.25
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+3.70
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.01



