2004 · Week 8

Final

Giants

New York

QB Kurt Warner

34·13

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -6.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

+4.3est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapVikings
  • -0.028EPA / play+0.162
  • 43.5%Success rate50.0%
  • -0.017EPA / dropback+0.287
  • -0.044EPA / rush-0.097
  • 8.2%Explosive rate10.7%
  • 29.5%Third-down rate52.5%
  • 53.1%Red-zone TD rate64.5%
  • 1.65Points / drive2.26
  • 2.2%Turnover rate2.0%
  • +0.008EPA / play allowed+0.107

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 12–7 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. MIN are 10-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16MIN @ NYG1613MIN
2024 · W1MIN @ NYG286MIN
2022 · playoffsNYG @ MIN3124NYG
2022 · W16NYG @ MIN2427MIN
2019 · W5MIN @ NYG2810MIN
2016 · W4NYG @ MIN1024MIN
2015 · W16NYG @ MIN1749MIN
2013 · W7MIN @ NYG723NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner13/2114400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tiki Barber241014.22
Mike Cloud9556.12
Ike Hilliard155.00
Kurt Warner200.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper24/4223112

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Daunte Culpepper5326.40
Mewelde Moore8293.60
Michael Bennett5204.01
Nate Burleson188.00
Moe Williams144.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +6.53.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

4.89%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.4%

Expected total

46.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.70
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.26