2007 · Week 6

Final

Rams

St. Louis

QB Gus Frerotte

3·22

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Kyle Boller

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · sportturf · 68°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

BAL -9

Total

36.5

Model margin

+0.9est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

1.1%est.

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

BAL lead 5–4 since 1999

Meetings average 40.9 points. BAL are 4-4-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6LA @ BAL17–3RAMS
2023 · W14LA @ BAL31–37BAL
2021 · W17LA @ BAL20–19RAMS
2019 · W12BAL @ LA45–6BAL
2015 · W11STL @ BAL13–16BAL
2011 · W3BAL @ STL37–7BAL
2003 · W10BAL @ STL22–33RAMS
1999 · W1BAL @ STL10–27RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSTL–BAL
BALQ1 15:0037Punt0–0
LAQ1 12:51619Punt0–0
BALQ1 9:59830Punt0–0
LAQ1 6:173-5Punt0–0
BALQ1 4:16432Field goal0–3
LAQ1 1:4624Turnover0–3
BALQ1 1:06724Field goal0–6
LAQ2 13:2410Turnover0–6
BALQ2 13:106-2Turnover0–6
LAQ2 10:533-1Missed field goal0–6
BALQ2 9:07948Touchdown0–13
LAQ2 4:13733Turnover on downs0–13
BALQ2 1:0348Punt0–13
LAQ2 0:36533End of half0–13
LAQ3 15:0020Turnover0–13
BALQ3 14:2038Field goal0–16
LAQ3 12:111166Field goal3–16
BALQ3 6:44848Turnover3–16
LAQ3 3:17323Turnover3–16
BALQ3 2:02514Field goal3–19
LAQ4 14:5744Turnover3–19
BALQ4 13:30526Field goal3–22
LAQ4 11:061573Turnover on downs3–22
BALQ4 3:5032Punt3–22
LAQ4 2:45319Turnover3–22
BALQ4 2:0733Punt3–22
LAQ4 1:0510End of half3–22

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyle Boller18/3018401

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Willis McGahee25612.41
Kyle Boller263.00
Musa Smith252.50
Mike Anderson122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +92.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

1.14%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.5%

Expected total

44.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.65
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.92

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.