2007 · Week 16

Final / OT

Falcons

Atlanta

QB Chris Redman

27·30

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

University of Phoenix Stadium · open · grass

Closing spread

ARI -11

Total

44

Model margin

+4.8est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

1.5%est.

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Falcons

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsFalcons wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Falconsedge mapCardinals
  • -0.148EPA / play-0.037
  • 37.3%Success rate42.9%
  • -0.138EPA / dropback+0.012
  • -0.167EPA / rush-0.116
  • 7.5%Explosive rate7.2%
  • -3.93CPOE+0.38
  • 36.4%Third-down rate36.9%
  • 48.0%Red-zone TD rate73.6%
  • 1.07Points / drive1.68
  • 2.4%Turnover rate3.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ATL lead 11–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46.8 points. ARI are 7-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16ATL @ ARI2619ATL
2023 · W10ATL @ ARI2325ARI
2022 · W17ARI @ ATL1920ATL
2019 · W6ATL @ ARI3334ARI
2018 · W15ARI @ ATL1440ATL
2016 · W12ARI @ ATL1938ATL
2014 · W13ARI @ ATL1829ATL
2013 · W8ATL @ ARI1327ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Falcons

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chris Redman28/4231521

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jerious Norwood7334.70
Warrick Dunn12131.10
Chris Redman111.00

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner36/5336130

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Edgerrin James25763.00
Kurt Warner100.00
J.J. Arrington100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +116.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Falcons.

Half-point at risk

1.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.7%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.83
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-1.65
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.75