Closing spread
PIT -6.5
Total
35.5
Model margin
+5.8est.
PIT perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Titans
- QuestionableJared CookTEAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableNate WashingtonWRHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableRyan MoutonCBAnkle· Full
- ProbableCraig HentrichPBack· Full
Steelers
- DoubtfulLawrence TimmonsLBAnkle· DNP
- ProbableDennis DixonQBR Shoulder· Full
Win probability
- Steelers
- Titans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.010EPA / play+0.043
- 40.8%Success rate44.8%
- +0.042EPA / dropback+0.124
- -0.026EPA / rush-0.083
- 9.0%Explosive rate10.2%
- -2.63CPOE+4.22
- 41.0%Third-down rate40.3%
- 60.6%Red-zone TD rate55.0%
- 1.79Points / drive1.83
- 2.8%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 11–10 since 1999
PIT have won 5 straight. Meetings average 44 points. PIT are 12-9 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TEN–PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 13:16 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 11:24 | 5 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 8:20 | 5 | 55 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 6:44 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 4:49 | 7 | 35 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 1:38 | 3 | 3 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 0:06 | 5 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q2 13:04 | 10 | 53 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q2 7:14 | 12 | 45 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q2 2:14 | 5 | 79 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| TEN | Q2 1:22 | 3 | 71 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| PIT | Q2 0:48 | 7 | 23 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| TEN | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 38 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| PIT | Q3 11:57 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TEN | Q3 9:53 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 7–7 |
| PIT | Q3 8:01 | 6 | 11 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TEN | Q3 5:08 | 7 | 24 | Punt | 7–7 |
| PIT | Q3 1:43 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TEN | Q4 14:51 | 6 | 36 | Field goal | 10–7 |
| PIT | Q4 11:03 | 11 | 56 | Field goal | 10–10 |
| TEN | Q4 2:57 | 4 | 12 | Punt | 10–10 |
| PIT | Q4 1:50 | 4 | 54 | Turnover | 10–10 |
| TEN | Q4 0:51 | 3 | 3 | End of half | 10–10 |
| PIT | OT | 9 | 63 | Field goal | 10–13 |
Box score
Individual performances
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Collins | 22/35 | 244 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Johnson | 15 | 57 | 3.8 | 0 |
| LenDale White | 8 | 28 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Kerry Collins | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenny Britt | 4 | 6 | 85 | 0 |
| Justin Gage | 7 | 11 | 78 | 1 |
| Bo Scaife | 5 | 6 | 48 | 0 |
| Chris Johnson | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Nate Washington | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
| Alge Crumpler | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 |
| LenDale White | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Craig Stevens | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 33/43 | 363 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willie Parker | 13 | 19 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 5 | 8 | 1.6 | 0 |
| Rashard Mendenhall | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santonio Holmes | 9 | 11 | 131 | 1 |
| Hines Ward | 8 | 10 | 103 | 0 |
| Heath Miller | 8 | 8 | 64 | 0 |
| Mike Wallace | 3 | 6 | 32 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 4 | 7 | 28 | 0 |
| Willie Parker | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Titans.
Half-point at risk
4.97%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
64.3%
Expected total
44.7est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.07
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment+3.22
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.78



