2009 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

10·23

49ers

San Francisco

QB Shaun Hill

Candlestick Park · outdoors · grass · 68°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

SF -1

Total

39.5

Model margin

+6.8est.

SF perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • 49ers
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

49ers winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge map49ers
  • -0.107EPA / play-0.067
  • 40.9%Success rate37.0%
  • -0.082EPA / dropback-0.055
  • -0.150EPA / rush-0.087
  • 7.2%Explosive rate8.1%
  • -1.58CPOE-2.69
  • 34.0%Third-down rate29.4%
  • 46.1%Red-zone TD rate68.0%
  • 1.38Points / drive1.54
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 31–20 since 1999

SEA have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.2 points. SF are 21-29-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsSF @ SEA641SEA
2025 · W18SEA @ SF133SEA
2025 · W1SF @ SEA1713SF
2024 · W11SEA @ SF2017SEA
2024 · W6SF @ SEA3624SF
2023 · W14SEA @ SF1628SF
2023 · W12SF @ SEA3113SF
2022 · playoffsSEA @ SF2341SF

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Seneca Wallace15/2312711
Matt Hasselbeck10/189700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Justin Forsett5357.00
Matt Hasselbeck3124.00
Julius Jones8111.40
Edgerrin James263.00
Justin Griffith111.00
Seneca Wallace410.30

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shaun Hill19/2614400
Micheal Spurlock0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Frank Gore1620712.92
Shaun Hill11717.00
Glen Coffee9131.40
Micheal Spurlock133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Frank Gore55390
Isaac Bruce48350
Vernon Davis26320
Glen Coffee22160
Arnaz Battle1110

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +13.1%6.0%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%

Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

2.00%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.8%

Expected total

42.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.37
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.09
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.77