2009 · Week 3

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Jason Campbell

14·19

Lions

Detroit

QB Matthew Stafford

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

WAS -6.5

Total

39.5

Model margin

-0.6est.

DET perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Lions
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Lions winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapLions
  • -0.047EPA / play-0.169
  • 41.0%Success rate39.2%
  • +0.023EPA / dropback-0.183
  • -0.168EPA / rush-0.144
  • 7.1%Explosive rate7.6%
  • +1.16CPOE-6.85
  • 39.7%Third-down rate35.8%
  • 53.9%Red-zone TD rate46.3%
  • 1.38Points / drive1.11
  • 2.3%Turnover rate3.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

DET lead 9–6 since 1999

Meetings average 46.5 points. DET are 9-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10DET @ WAS4422DET
2024 · playoffsWAS @ DET4531WAS
2022 · W2WAS @ DET2736DET
2020 · W10WAS @ DET2730DET
2019 · W12DET @ WAS1619WAS
2016 · W7WAS @ DET1720DET
2013 · W3DET @ WAS2720DET
2010 · W8WAS @ DET2537DET

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jason Campbell27/4134021

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis12423.50
Jason Campbell12121.00
Ladell Betts122.00

Lions

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matthew Stafford21/3624110

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kevin Smith161016.30
Matthew Stafford22311.50
Maurice Morris8101.31
Calvin Johnson199.00
Aaron Brown561.20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -6.52.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%

Positive margins favour Lions; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.98%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.4%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.12
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.63