2009 · Week 5

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

38·10

Rams

St. Louis

QB Kyle Boller

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -10

Total

40.5

Model margin

+0.2est.

STL perspective

Push chance

2.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Vikings

Rams

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 8–6 since 1999

RAMS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 53.3 points. STL are 7-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · playoffsMIN @ LA9–27RAMS
2024 · W8MIN @ LA20–30RAMS
2021 · W16LA @ MIN30–23RAMS
2018 · W4MIN @ LA31–38RAMS
2017 · W11LA @ MIN7–24MIN
2015 · W9STL @ MIN18–21MIN
2014 · W1MIN @ STL34–6MIN
2012 · W15MIN @ STL36–22MIN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultMIN–STL
MINQ1 15:00980Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 10:17532Opp touchdown14–0
LAQ1 8:0049Punt14–0
MINQ1 6:0033Punt14–0
LAQ1 4:271585Turnover14–0
MINQ2 11:48416Turnover14–0
LAQ2 9:37614Field goal14–3
MINQ2 7:38427Field goal17–3
LAQ2 5:34967Turnover17–3
MINQ2 1:51531End of half17–3
LAQ3 15:0039Punt17–3
MINQ3 12:59790Touchdown24–3
LAQ3 9:1538Punt24–3
MINQ3 7:3636Punt24–3
LAQ3 5:591557Turnover24–3
MINQ4 14:491046Touchdown31–3
LAQ4 10:01660Touchdown31–10
MINQ4 6:45978Touchdown38–10
LAQ4 1:55559End of half38–10

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre18/2423211
Tarvaris Jackson3/36800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson15694.62
Chester Taylor9202.21

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -102.7%4.4%2.9%7.3%7.4%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.68%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.5%

Expected total

44.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.39
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin+0.17

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.