2009 · Week 6 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

27·3

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

Qwest Field · outdoors · fieldturf · 58°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

SEA -3

Total

45.5

Model margin

-0.3est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

7.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.026EPA / play-0.107
  • 45.3%Success rate40.9%
  • +0.037EPA / dropback-0.082
  • -0.143EPA / rush-0.150
  • 9.9%Explosive rate7.2%
  • +3.71CPOE-1.58
  • 36.7%Third-down rate34.0%
  • 73.5%Red-zone TD rate46.1%
  • 1.75Points / drive1.38
  • 3.4%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 30–17–1 since 1999

SEA have won 9 straight. Meetings average 43.5 points. SEA are 26-21-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10ARI @ SEA2244SEA
2025 · W4SEA @ ARI2320SEA
2024 · W14SEA @ ARI3018SEA
2024 · W12ARI @ SEA616SEA
2023 · W18SEA @ ARI2120SEA
2023 · W7ARI @ SEA1020SEA
2022 · W9SEA @ ARI3121SEA
2022 · W6ARI @ SEA919SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner32/4127621
Matt Leinart2/21600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower13322.51
Chris Wells12292.40
Matt Leinart111.00

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck10/2911201

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Julius Jones551.00
Justin Forsett242.00
Edgerrin James331.00
Matt Hasselbeck122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

7.32%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.4%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.74
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.26