2009 · Week 11

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

9·35

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -10.5

Total

47

Model margin

+7.8est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapVikings
  • -0.107EPA / play+0.085
  • 40.9%Success rate45.1%
  • -0.082EPA / dropback+0.239
  • -0.150EPA / rush-0.130
  • 7.2%Explosive rate10.4%
  • -1.58CPOE+5.77
  • 34.0%Third-down rate45.4%
  • 46.1%Red-zone TD rate68.8%
  • 1.38Points / drive2.31
  • 2.8%Turnover rate1.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46.5 points. MIN are 7-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W13MIN @ SEA026SEA
2024 · W16MIN @ SEA2724MIN
2021 · W3SEA @ MIN1730MIN
2020 · W5MIN @ SEA2627SEA
2019 · W13MIN @ SEA3037SEA
2018 · W14MIN @ SEA721SEA
2015 · playoffsSEA @ MIN109SEA
2015 · W13SEA @ MIN387SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck19/2623101
Seneca Wallace0/3000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Justin Forsett891.11
Matt Hasselbeck242.00
Justin Griffith100.00
Seneca Wallace1-9-9.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Nate Burleson681000
Justin Forsett89800
T.J. Houshmandzadeh46360
Deion Branch12150
John Carlson0400

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre22/2521340
Tarvaris Jackson6/87710

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson24823.40
Chester Taylor11736.60
Tarvaris Jackson252.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +10.55.7%7.1%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.3%2.7%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

1.66%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

69.4%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+5.33
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+7.82