Closing spread
MIN -10
Total
47
Model margin
+6.6est.
MIN perspective
Push chance
3.4%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bears
- OutPisa TinoisamoaLBKnee· Out (Definitely Will Not Play)
- DoubtfulDesmond ClarkTENeck· DNP
- ProbableKellen DavisTEAnkle· Full
- ProbableKevin PayneSBack· Full
- ProbableRoberto GarzaGAnkle· Full
- ProbableTommie HarrisDTKnee· Full
Vikings
- DoubtfulAnthony HerreraGConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableAdrian PetersonRBAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableAntoine WinfieldCBFoot· Limited
- ProbableNaufahu TahiRBAnkle· Limited
- ProbableBenny SappCBGroin· Full
- ProbableBernard BerrianWRHamstring· Full
- ProbableE.J. HendersonLBKnee· Full
Win probability
- Vikings
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.089EPA / play+0.085
- 39.6%Success rate45.1%
- -0.064EPA / dropback+0.239
- -0.135EPA / rush-0.130
- 8.4%Explosive rate10.4%
- +0.30CPOE+5.77
- 37.3%Third-down rate45.4%
- 52.0%Red-zone TD rate68.8%
- 1.57Points / drive2.31
- 3.2%Turnover rate1.6%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
MIN lead 29–26 since 1999
Meetings average 41.3 points. MIN are 24-30-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–MIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 40 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 11:34 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| MIN | Q1 9:30 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 8:39 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| MIN | Q1 6:48 | 15 | 97 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q2 14:56 | 6 | 54 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q2 12:12 | 8 | 80 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q2 8:06 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 7–14 |
| MIN | Q2 7:59 | 3 | -3 | Field goal | 7–17 |
| CHI | Q2 7:02 | 9 | 57 | Turnover | 7–17 |
| MIN | Q2 2:45 | 4 | 15 | Punt | 7–17 |
| CHI | Q2 1:47 | 5 | 33 | Turnover | 7–17 |
| MIN | Q2 0:57 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–24 |
| CHI | Q2 0:17 | 1 | 5 | End of half | 7–24 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -7 | Field goal | 10–24 |
| MIN | Q3 12:44 | 13 | 82 | Field goal | 10–27 |
| CHI | Q3 7:45 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 10–27 |
| MIN | Q3 6:12 | 12 | 81 | Field goal | 10–30 |
| CHI | Q4 13:36 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 10–30 |
| MIN | Q4 11:44 | 9 | 43 | Touchdown | 10–36 |
| CHI | Q4 6:35 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 10–36 |
| MIN | Q4 5:21 | 5 | 23 | End of half | 10–36 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 18/23 | 147 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Forte | 8 | 27 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Jay Cutler | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Olsen | 7 | 8 | 45 | 0 |
| Matt Forte | 4 | 4 | 34 | 0 |
| Johnny Knox | 1 | 2 | 24 | 1 |
| Devin Hester | 1 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
| Earl Bennett | 3 | 5 | 14 | 0 |
| Devin Aromashodu | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Kahlil Bell | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Favre | 32/48 | 392 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Peterson | 25 | 85 | 3.4 | 1 |
| Percy Harvin | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 0 |
| Chester Taylor | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 0 |
| Tarvaris Jackson | 3 | -4 | -1.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percy Harvin | 6 | 8 | 101 | 1 |
| Sidney Rice | 6 | 10 | 89 | 0 |
| Bernard Berrian | 6 | 9 | 74 | 0 |
| Chester Taylor | 6 | 7 | 51 | 1 |
| Visanthe Shiancoe | 5 | 9 | 51 | 1 |
| Adrian Peterson | 2 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
3.37%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
66.4%
Expected total
43.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.10
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+6.59



