2009 · Week 16 · Division

Final / OT

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

30·36

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 26°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

MIN -9

Total

41

Model margin

-1.6est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

1.2%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • +0.085EPA / play-0.089
  • 45.1%Success rate39.6%
  • +0.239EPA / dropback-0.064
  • -0.130EPA / rush-0.135
  • 10.4%Explosive rate8.4%
  • +5.77CPOE+0.30
  • 45.4%Third-down rate37.3%
  • 68.8%Red-zone TD rate52.0%
  • 2.31Points / drive1.57
  • 1.6%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre26/4032120

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson24943.92
Chester Taylor8293.60
Percy Harvin100.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler20/3527341

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte21743.50
Kahlil Bell4215.30
Jay Cutler3103.30

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Devin Aromashodu791501
Greg Olsen36471
Desmond Clark57391
Earl Bennett37351
Rashied Davis1190
Jason McKie0100
Johnny Knox0300
Matt Forte11-70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -92.9%4.6%3.0%7.5%7.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

1.17%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

44.7%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.10
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-1.61