Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2011 · Week 6 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Donovan McNabb

10·39

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 56°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

CHI -1

Total

41.5

Model margin

+1.4est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • -0.054EPA / play-0.110
  • 39.2%Success rate39.3%
  • -0.073EPA / dropback-0.105
  • -0.026EPA / rush-0.117
  • 10.1%Explosive rate9.6%
  • -5.80CPOE-2.53
  • 38.8%Third-down rate32.9%
  • 63.1%Red-zone TD rate62.0%
  • 1.60Points / drive1.37
  • 2.4%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Donovan McNabb19/2417700
Christian Ponder9/179900
Joe Webb0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson12393.31
Christian Ponder188.00
Percy Harvin155.00
Toby Gerhart133.00
Joe Webb111.00
Lorenzo Booker1-3-3.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler21/3126720

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte17875.10
Marion Barber11322.91

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.8%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.97
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-1.97
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+1.40