Closing spread
PHI -3
Total
49
Model margin
+4.3est.
PHI perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Cowboys
- OutFelix JonesRBAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableDerrick DockeryGKnee· Limited
- QuestionableJason HatcherDECalf· Limited
- QuestionableKyle KosierGFoot· Limited
- QuestionableTashard ChoiceRBShoulder· DNP
- ProbableBarry ChurchSShoulder· Full
- ProbableDavid BuehlerKright Groin· Full
- ProbableMat McBriarPleft Foot· Full
- ProbableTony RomoQBRibs· Full
Eagles
- ProbableDarryl TappDEPectoral· Full
- ProbableJason PetersTHamstring· Full
- ProbableJuqua ParkerDEAnkle· Full
- ProbableKing DunlapTBack· Full
- ProbableNate AllenSKnee· Full
- ProbableTrent ColeDECalf· Full
- ProbableWinston JusticeTKnee· Full
Win probability
- Eagles
- Cowboys
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.047EPA / play+0.053
- 45.1%Success rate47.0%
- +0.144EPA / dropback+0.077
- -0.111EPA / rush+0.010
- 9.0%Explosive rate12.1%
- +4.08CPOE+0.41
- 39.2%Third-down rate42.0%
- 55.2%Red-zone TD rate54.9%
- 1.79Points / drive1.91
- 2.0%Turnover rate3.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PHI lead 29–27 since 1999
DAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45 points. PHI are 27-28-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | DAL–PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 74 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| DAL | Q1 10:41 | 6 | 17 | Punt | 0–7 |
| PHI | Q1 7:11 | 7 | 95 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| DAL | Q1 2:40 | 3 | 28 | Turnover | 0–14 |
| PHI | Q1 1:13 | 11 | 72 | Touchdown | 0–21 |
| DAL | Q2 10:13 | 5 | 25 | Punt | 0–21 |
| PHI | Q2 7:54 | 12 | 83 | Field goal | 0–24 |
| DAL | Q2 1:46 | 6 | 24 | Punt | 0–24 |
| DAL | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 0–24 |
| PHI | Q3 12:23 | 12 | 68 | Field goal | 0–27 |
| DAL | Q3 5:55 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–27 |
| PHI | Q3 5:03 | 10 | 73 | Touchdown | 0–34 |
| DAL | Q4 13:21 | 2 | 76 | Touchdown | 7–34 |
| PHI | Q4 12:44 | 5 | 9 | Punt | 7–34 |
| DAL | Q4 9:00 | 12 | 36 | Turnover on downs | 7–34 |
| PHI | Q4 6:07 | 6 | 21 | Punt | 7–34 |
| DAL | Q4 1:50 | 8 | 41 | End of half | 7–34 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cowboys
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Romo | 18/35 | 203 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeMarco Murray | 8 | 74 | 9.3 | 0 |
| Tony Romo | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Phillip Tanner | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurent Robinson | 5 | 8 | 103 | 1 |
| Jason Witten | 4 | 12 | 28 | 0 |
| Dez Bryant | 3 | 5 | 28 | 0 |
| Miles Austin | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Phillip Tanner | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Martellus Bennett | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| DeMarco Murray | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Vick | 21/28 | 279 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeSean McCoy | 30 | 185 | 6.2 | 2 |
| Mike Vick | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 0 |
| Ronnie Brown | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Celek | 7 | 9 | 94 | 1 |
| Jason Avant | 5 | 5 | 74 | 0 |
| Jeremy Maclin | 3 | 3 | 54 | 1 |
| DeSean Jackson | 3 | 6 | 31 | 0 |
| LeSean McCoy | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Clay Harbor | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Eagles; negative favour Cowboys.
Half-point at risk
7.49%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.6%
Expected total
45.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.26
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.56
- Expected margin+4.30



