Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2018 · CON

Final / OT

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

26·23

Saints

New Orleans

QB Drew Brees

Mercedes-Benz Superdome · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

NO -3

Total

55

Model margin

+1.3est.

NO perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Saints
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Saints winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ramsedge mapSaints
  • +0.149EPA / play+0.156
  • 50.8%Success rate49.9%
  • +0.203EPA / dropback+0.284
  • +0.065EPA / rush-0.011
  • 12.1%Explosive rate10.2%
  • +1.24CPOE+5.42
  • 45.0%Third-down rate46.3%
  • 57.8%Red-zone TD rate70.6%
  • 2.63Points / drive2.94
  • 1.7%Turnover rate1.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 14–9 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 51.9 points. NO are 8-15 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W9NO @ LA1034RAMS
2024 · W13LA @ NO2114RAMS
2023 · W16NO @ LA2230RAMS
2022 · W11LA @ NO2027NO
2019 · W2NO @ LA927RAMS
2018 · W9LA @ NO3545NO
2017 · W12NO @ LA2026RAMS
2016 · W12LA @ NO2149NO

Box score

Individual performances

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff25/4029711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
C.J. Anderson16442.80
Josh Reynolds11616.00
Todd Gurley4102.51
Jared Goff3103.30
Robert Woods2-3-1.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Brandin Cooks781070
Josh Reynolds47740
Gerald Everett24500
Robert Woods611330
Tyler Higbee44251
C.J. Anderson1150
Todd Gurley1330

Saints

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Drew Brees26/4024921
Taysom Hill0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mark Ingram9313.40
Alvin Kamara8151.90
Taysom Hill100.00
Drew Brees2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Saints; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

7.47%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.7%

Expected total

46.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.32
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+1.34