Closing spread
PHI -2
Total
49.5
Model margin
+2.7est.
PHI perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Packers
- OutArron MosbyDENot injury related - personal matter· Note
- QuestionableEmanuel WilsonRBHip· Limited
- QuestionableMarShawn LloydRBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableTucker KraftTEBack· Limited
Eagles
- OutDevin WhiteLBAnkle· DNP
- OutIsaiah RodgersCBHand· Limited
Win probability
- Eagles
- Packers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.081EPA / play+0.111
- 44.8%Success rate45.2%
- +0.182EPA / dropback+0.165
- -0.030EPA / rush+0.056
- 11.7%Explosive rate10.7%
- +1.37CPOE+6.20
- 37.6%Third-down rate42.4%
- 64.5%Red-zone TD rate64.1%
- 2.38Points / drive2.46
- 1.7%Turnover rate1.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PHI lead 11–7 since 1999
PHI have won 4 straight. Meetings average 42.9 points. PHI are 11-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | GB–PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 27 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PHI | Q1 11:40 | 3 | -5 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| GB | Q1 10:46 | 5 | 4 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| PHI | Q1 8:26 | 3 | 4 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| GB | Q1 7:06 | 9 | 28 | Field goal | 6–0 |
| PHI | Q1 3:01 | 11 | 64 | Touchdown | 6–7 |
| GB | Q2 12:38 | 5 | 70 | Touchdown | 12–7 |
| PHI | Q2 10:16 | 9 | 70 | Touchdown | 12–14 |
| GB | Q2 5:34 | 3 | 70 | Touchdown | 19–14 |
| PHI | Q2 5:11 | 13 | 62 | Field goal | 19–17 |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 2 | 70 | Touchdown | 19–24 |
| GB | Q3 14:09 | 8 | 37 | Touchdown | 26–24 |
| PHI | Q3 11:55 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 26–24 |
| GB | Q3 10:26 | 5 | 12 | Punt | 26–24 |
| PHI | Q3 8:47 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 26–24 |
| GB | Q3 7:21 | 3 | 9 | Turnover | 26–24 |
| PHI | Q3 6:08 | 4 | 24 | Touchdown | 26–31 |
| GB | Q3 4:26 | 8 | 45 | Missed field goal | 26–31 |
| PHI | Q3 0:17 | 7 | 53 | Turnover | 26–31 |
| GB | Q4 12:53 | 9 | 79 | Field goal | 29–31 |
| PHI | Q4 7:52 | 17 | 64 | Field goal | 29–34 |
| GB | Q4 0:27 | 4 | 33 | End of half | 29–34 |
Box score
Individual performances
Packers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 17/34 | 260 | 2 | 1 |
| Malik Willis | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 16 | 84 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 0 |
| Jayden Reed | 1 | 33 | 33.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 6 | 138 | 1 |
| Romeo Doubs | 4 | 7 | 50 | 0 |
| Tucker Kraft | 2 | 3 | 37 | 0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Christian Watson | 3 | 5 | 13 | 1 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Musgrave | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Hurts | 20/34 | 278 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 24 | 109 | 4.5 | 2 |
| Jalen Hurts | 13 | 33 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.J. Brown | 5 | 10 | 119 | 1 |
| DeVonta Smith | 7 | 8 | 84 | 0 |
| Dallas Goedert | 4 | 5 | 31 | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 2 | 2 | 23 | 1 |
| Grant Calcaterra | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Jahan Dotson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Johnny Wilson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Eagles; negative favour Packers.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.3%
Expected total
44.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.98
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.69



