Closing spread
LAC -3
Total
41.5
Model margin
+1.0est.
LAC perspective
Push chance
7.4%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Broncos
- OutJaleel McLaughlinRBQuadricep· DNP
- OutRiley MossCBKnee· Limited
Chargers
- OutCam HartCBConcussion· DNP
- OutWill DisslyTEShoulder· DNP
- DoubtfulElijah MoldenCBKnee· DNP
- QuestionableDenzel PerrymanLBGroin· Full
- QuestionableHayden HurstTEHip· Full
- QuestionableOtito OgbonniaDTPelvis· Limited
- QuestionableZion JohnsonGAnkle· Full
Win probability
- Chargers
- Broncos
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.011EPA / play+0.044
- 42.8%Success rate42.3%
- +0.062EPA / dropback+0.127
- -0.075EPA / rush-0.079
- 9.0%Explosive rate9.2%
- +0.58CPOE+1.69
- 40.4%Third-down rate40.1%
- 65.1%Red-zone TD rate59.6%
- 2.16Points / drive2.25
- 1.8%Turnover rate0.8%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
DEN lead 33–23 since 1999
DEN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.8 points. LAC are 25-26-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | DEN–LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| DEN | Q1 13:30 | 10 | 74 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| LAC | Q1 7:34 | 8 | 70 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| DEN | Q1 3:09 | 12 | 70 | Touchdown | 14–7 |
| LAC | Q2 12:17 | 7 | 51 | Field goal | 14–10 |
| DEN | Q2 8:50 | 6 | 75 | Touchdown | 21–10 |
| LAC | Q2 6:22 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 21–10 |
| DEN | Q2 5:00 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 21–10 |
| LAC | Q2 2:34 | 7 | 49 | Turnover | 21–10 |
| DEN | Q2 0:41 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 21–13 |
| LAC | Q2 0:00 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 21–13 |
| DEN | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 49 | Field goal | 24–13 |
| LAC | Q3 8:31 | 10 | 64 | Touchdown | 24–19 |
| DEN | Q3 2:58 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 24–19 |
| LAC | Q3 0:45 | 9 | 58 | Touchdown | 24–27 |
| DEN | Q4 12:23 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 24–27 |
| LAC | Q4 9:48 | 6 | 4 | Punt | 24–27 |
| DEN | Q4 6:41 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 24–27 |
| LAC | Q4 4:28 | 6 | 90 | Touchdown | 24–34 |
| DEN | Q4 2:27 | 7 | 43 | Field goal | 27–34 |
| LAC | Q4 0:57 | 1 | 0 | Turnover on downs | 27–34 |
Box score
Individual performances
Broncos
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Nix | 29/40 | 263 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audric Estimé | 9 | 48 | 5.3 | 1 |
| Bo Nix | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Blake Watson | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Marvin Mims Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin Mims Jr. | 3 | 5 | 62 | 0 |
| Courtland Sutton | 5 | 6 | 50 | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 7 | 11 | 29 | 0 |
| Troy Franklin | 2 | 3 | 25 | 0 |
| Lucas Krull | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 |
| Devaughn Vele | 2 | 3 | 21 | 1 |
| Nate Adkins | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 |
| Blake Watson | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Adam Trautman | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 23/31 | 284 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gus Edwards | 14 | 68 | 4.9 | 2 |
| Justin Herbert | 8 | 28 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Kimani Vidal | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 0 |
| Derius Davis | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ladd McConkey | 6 | 6 | 87 | 0 |
| Josh Palmer | 3 | 6 | 41 | 0 |
| Hassan Haskins | 2 | 2 | 39 | 1 |
| Stone Smartt | 3 | 3 | 37 | 0 |
| Derius Davis | 2 | 2 | 31 | 1 |
| Quentin Johnston | 3 | 6 | 18 | 0 |
| Tucker Fisk | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Hayden Hurst | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Gus Edwards | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Broncos.
Half-point at risk
7.44%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
51.7%
Expected total
43.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.73
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.97



