2026 · Week 5
FinalAT&T Stadium · closed · matrixturf
Closing spread
DAL -9.5
Total
49.5
Model margin
+2.4est.
DAL perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Buccaneers
- OutAntoine Winfield Jr.SRib· DNP
- OutBaker MayfieldQBThumb· DNP
- OutBenjamin MorrisonCBQuadricep· DNP
- OutSirVocea DennisLBAnkle· DNP
- LimitedAnthony NelsonLBIllness
Cowboys
- OutCobie DurantCBHamstring· DNP
- OutDeMarvion OvershownLBHamstring· DNP
- OutDrew SheltonTHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableJonathan MingoWRIllness· DNP
- QuestionableTyler SmithGThumb· Full
Win probability
- Cowboys
- Buccaneers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.081EPA / play+0.142
- 40.9%Success rate48.8%
- -0.130EPA / dropback+0.203
- -0.011EPA / rush+0.017
- 7.4%Explosive rate6.6%
- -2.76CPOE+1.17
- 40.9%Third-down rate48.7%
- 56.2%Red-zone TD rate76.8%
- 1.86Points / drive2.97
- 2.4%Turnover rate1.3%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
DAL lead 9–7 since 1999
Meetings average 36.8 points. DAL are 8-7-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TB–DAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 63 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| TB | Q1 10:51 | 18 | 68 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q2 14:53 | 5 | 12 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TB | Q2 12:26 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q2 11:00 | 5 | 12 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TB | Q2 9:13 | 8 | 37 | Punt | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q2 3:40 | 4 | 0 | Punt | 7–7 |
| TB | Q2 3:03 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q2 1:52 | 5 | 59 | Field goal | 7–10 |
| TB | Q2 0:21 | 3 | 34 | End of half | 7–10 |
| TB | Q3 15:00 | 2 | 86 | Touchdown | 14–10 |
| DAL | Q3 14:00 | 6 | 41 | Turnover | 14–10 |
| TB | Q3 10:43 | 6 | 85 | Touchdown | 21–10 |
| DAL | Q3 7:31 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 21–10 |
| TB | Q3 7:24 | 7 | 19 | Field goal | 24–10 |
| DAL | Q3 2:58 | 5 | 18 | Turnover on downs | 24–10 |
| TB | Q3 1:46 | 14 | 49 | Turnover on downs | 24–10 |
| DAL | Q4 8:32 | 10 | 99 | Touchdown | 24–16 |
| TB | Q4 5:26 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 24–16 |
| DAL | Q4 3:42 | 8 | 62 | Turnover | 24–16 |
| TB | Q4 1:16 | 2 | 20 | End of half | 24–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Buccaneers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalon Daniels | 19/25 | 189 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucky Irving | 21 | 165 | 7.9 | 1 |
| Jalon Daniels | 7 | 23 | 3.3 | 0 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Sean Tucker | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Emeka Egbuka | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 1 |
| Chris Godwin Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tez Johnson | 1 | 1 | 64 | 0 |
| Emeka Egbuka | 6 | 9 | 38 | 0 |
| Chris Godwin Jr. | 3 | 3 | 37 | 0 |
| Cade Otton | 3 | 4 | 25 | 0 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 3 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Bucky Irving | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 |
| Payne Durham | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Cowboys
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dak Prescott | 24/42 | 316 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javonte Williams | 12 | 45 | 3.8 | 1 |
| Hunter Luepke | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Pickens | 9 | 13 | 130 | 1 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 3 | 4 | 90 | 0 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 2 | 4 | 22 | 0 |
| Jonathan Mingo | 2 | 4 | 20 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 3 | 6 | 19 | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 2 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
| Luke Schoonmaker | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Brevyn Spann-Ford | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Cowboys; negative favour Buccaneers.
Half-point at risk
2.99%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
55.4%
Expected total
44.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.66
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment-0.52
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.36



