2004 · Week 1

Final

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Brad Johnson

10·16

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 81°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

WAS -2.5

Total

38.5

Model margin

+2.8est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Buccaneers

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBuccaneers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Buccaneersedge mapCommanders
  • -0.072EPA / play-0.121
  • 42.6%Success rate38.9%
  • +0.008EPA / dropback-0.102
  • -0.203EPA / rush-0.145
  • 8.5%Explosive rate6.6%
  • 37.9%Third-down rate31.9%
  • 58.7%Red-zone TD rate56.8%
  • 1.25Points / drive1.03
  • 3.6%Turnover rate2.5%
  • -0.089EPA / play allowed-0.104

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 9–9 since 1999

Meetings average 40.5 points. WAS are 9-7-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · playoffsWAS @ TB2320WAS
2024 · W1WAS @ TB2037TB
2021 · W10TB @ WAS1929WAS
2020 · playoffsTB @ WAS3123TB
2018 · W10WAS @ TB163WAS
2015 · W7TB @ WAS3031WAS
2014 · W11TB @ WAS277TB
2012 · W4WAS @ TB2422WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson24/3716901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Charlie Garner11252.30

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell13/2412500

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis291485.11
Ladell Betts5173.40
Mark Brunell510.20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.53.9%2.6%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Buccaneers.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.7%

Expected total

42.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.03
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.24
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.83