2004 · Week 6

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

13·10

Bears

Chicago

QB Jonathan Quinn

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 42°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

CHI -1.5

Total

33.5

Model margin

+4.4est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapBears
  • -0.121EPA / play-0.240
  • 38.9%Success rate35.2%
  • -0.102EPA / dropback-0.283
  • -0.145EPA / rush-0.177
  • 6.6%Explosive rate6.8%
  • 31.9%Third-down rate25.7%
  • 56.8%Red-zone TD rate43.9%
  • 1.03Points / drive0.78
  • 2.5%Turnover rate3.4%
  • -0.104EPA / play allowed-0.102

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. CHI are 5-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell8/229511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis361714.80
Ladell Betts6305.00
Mark Brunell5173.40

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jonathan Quinn10/226501

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones24974.00
Jonathan Quinn23216.00
Anthony Thomas111.00
Bobby Wade1-4-4.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +1.53.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.11%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.8%

Expected total

42.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.18
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.43
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+4.38