Closing spread
NYG -9
Total
34.5
Model margin
+6.5est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
1.3%est.
Win probability
- Giants
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.240EPA / play-0.028
- 35.2%Success rate43.5%
- -0.283EPA / dropback-0.017
- -0.177EPA / rush-0.044
- 6.8%Explosive rate8.2%
- 25.7%Third-down rate29.5%
- 43.9%Red-zone TD rate53.1%
- 0.78Points / drive1.65
- 3.4%Turnover rate2.2%
- -0.102EPA / play allowed+0.008
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CHI lead 7–6 since 1999
Meetings average 38.4 points. NYG are 9-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 13:17 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 12:15 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 10:40 | 6 | 33 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 8:03 | 8 | 11 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| NYG | Q1 4:43 | 2 | 21 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q1 3:54 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q1 2:46 | 6 | 38 | Turnover | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q1 0:18 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q2 13:41 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q2 12:33 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q2 10:45 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q2 8:46 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q2 7:44 | 4 | 7 | Punt | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q2 6:02 | 2 | 63 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| NYG | Q2 5:13 | 3 | 4 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q2 3:36 | 3 | 16 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| NYG | Q2 2:35 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 14–14 |
| CHI | Q2 2:17 | 3 | 0 | Field goal | 17–14 |
| NYG | Q2 1:09 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 17–14 |
| CHI | Q2 0:46 | 5 | 38 | Field goal | 20–14 |
| NYG | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 20–14 |
| CHI | Q3 12:58 | 5 | 11 | Turnover | 20–14 |
| NYG | Q3 10:34 | 2 | -6 | Turnover | 20–14 |
| CHI | Q3 9:43 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 20–14 |
| NYG | Q3 8:09 | 3 | 14 | Punt | 20–14 |
| CHI | Q3 6:18 | 4 | -10 | Punt | 20–14 |
| NYG | Q3 4:27 | 8 | 61 | Turnover on downs | 20–14 |
| CHI | Q3 0:30 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 20–14 |
| NYG | Q4 13:46 | 5 | 21 | Punt | 20–14 |
| CHI | Q4 11:35 | 6 | 76 | Touchdown | 28–14 |
| NYG | Q4 7:44 | 12 | 51 | Turnover on downs | 28–14 |
| CHI | Q4 4:05 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 28–14 |
| NYG | Q4 2:23 | 3 | 11 | Touchdown | 28–21 |
| CHI | Q4 1:56 | 0 | 0 | Turnover on downs | 28–21 |
| NYG | Q4 1:54 | 4 | -10 | Turnover on downs | 28–21 |
| CHI | Q4 1:00 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 28–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig Krenzel | 8/21 | 144 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Thomas | 28 | 110 | 3.9 | 2 |
| Craig Krenzel | 6 | 12 | 2.0 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurt Warner | 18/36 | 195 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 21 | 72 | 3.4 | 2 |
| Mike Cloud | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Kurt Warner | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
1.32%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
66.2%
Expected total
43.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.93
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+3.01
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+6.50



