2004 · Week 9

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Craig Krenzel

28·21

Giants

New York

QB Kurt Warner

Giants Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 71°F · wind 22mph

Closing spread

NYG -9

Total

34.5

Model margin

+6.5est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

1.3%est.

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapGiants
  • -0.240EPA / play-0.028
  • 35.2%Success rate43.5%
  • -0.283EPA / dropback-0.017
  • -0.177EPA / rush-0.044
  • 6.8%Explosive rate8.2%
  • 25.7%Third-down rate29.5%
  • 43.9%Red-zone TD rate53.1%
  • 0.78Points / drive1.65
  • 3.4%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.102EPA / play allowed+0.008

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CHI lead 7–6 since 1999

Meetings average 38.4 points. NYG are 9-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10NYG @ CHI2024CHI
2022 · W4CHI @ NYG1220NYG
2021 · W17NYG @ CHI329CHI
2020 · W2NYG @ CHI1317CHI
2019 · W12NYG @ CHI1419CHI
2018 · W13CHI @ NYG2730NYG
2016 · W11CHI @ NYG1622NYG
2013 · W6NYG @ CHI2127CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Craig Krenzel8/2114410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Anthony Thomas281103.92
Craig Krenzel6122.00

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner18/3619512

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tiki Barber21723.42
Mike Cloud3165.30
Kurt Warner133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +96.0%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.32%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.2%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.93
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.01
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.50