Closing spread
BUF -9.5
Total
33
Model margin
+7.0est.
BUF perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Bills
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.044EPA / play-0.073
- 44.9%Success rate40.7%
- +0.136EPA / dropback-0.012
- -0.028EPA / rush-0.139
- 10.4%Explosive rate8.2%
- 44.9%Third-down rate35.8%
- 56.0%Red-zone TD rate48.1%
- 1.83Points / drive1.71
- 2.1%Turnover rate2.7%
- -0.133EPA / play allowed-0.135
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 7–6 since 1999
BUF have won 3 straight. Meetings average 38 points. BUF are 6-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–BUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 12:51 | 6 | 16 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| BUF | Q1 10:44 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 3–0 |
| PIT | Q1 9:12 | 1 | 3 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| BUF | Q1 9:06 | 5 | 50 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| PIT | Q1 6:14 | 6 | 49 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| BUF | Q1 3:28 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| PIT | Q1 3:15 | 8 | 25 | Field goal | 13–7 |
| BUF | Q2 13:39 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 13–7 |
| PIT | Q2 12:00 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 13–7 |
| BUF | Q2 11:49 | 4 | 0 | Punt | 13–7 |
| PIT | Q2 10:53 | 14 | 69 | Field goal | 16–7 |
| BUF | Q2 4:22 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 16–7 |
| PIT | Q2 2:10 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 16–7 |
| BUF | Q2 1:41 | 8 | 38 | Field goal | 16–10 |
| PIT | Q2 0:03 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 16–10 |
| BUF | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 16–10 |
| PIT | Q3 13:16 | 3 | 2 | Opp touchdown | 16–17 |
| PIT | Q3 12:31 | 6 | -5 | Punt | 16–17 |
| BUF | Q3 9:22 | 12 | 88 | Missed field goal | 16–17 |
| PIT | Q3 1:49 | 4 | 61 | Field goal | 19–17 |
| BUF | Q4 14:49 | 3 | -2 | Opp touchdown | 26–17 |
| BUF | Q4 13:24 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 26–17 |
| PIT | Q4 11:16 | 14 | 36 | Field goal | 29–17 |
| BUF | Q4 2:23 | 5 | 89 | Touchdown | 29–24 |
| PIT | Q4 1:18 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 29–24 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Maddox | 12/24 | 120 | 1 | 2 |
| Brian St. Pierre | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willie Parker | 19 | 102 | 5.4 | 0 |
| Duce Staley | 8 | 21 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Tommy Maddox | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Brian St. Pierre | 4 | -3 | -0.8 | 0 |
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew Bledsoe | 16/30 | 189 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willis McGahee | 18 | 79 | 4.4 | 2 |
| Lee Evans | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Shaud Williams | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Drew Bledsoe | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
3.39%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
67.5%
Expected total
41.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.28
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+4.75
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+7.03



