Closing spread
HOU -4.5
Total
44.5
Model margin
+1.9est.
HOU perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Jets
- QuestionableMike DevitoDEHamstring· Limited
- ProbableBryan ThomasLBAnkle· Full
- ProbableDustin KellerTEToe· Full
- ProbableKellen ClemensQBright Elbow· Full
- ProbableShonn GreeneRBRibs· Full
- ProbableWallace WrightWRKnee· Full
Texans
- OutEugene WilsonCBKnee· DNP
- OutJacques ReevesCBFibula· Full
- QuestionableDeljuan RobinsonDTCalf· Full
- QuestionableKevin WalterWRHamstring· DNP
- ProbableMatt SchaubQBAnkle· Full
Win probability
- Texans
- Jets
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.060EPA / play+0.043
- 39.7%Success rate46.2%
- -0.151EPA / dropback+0.159
- +0.011EPA / rush-0.149
- 10.1%Explosive rate9.6%
- -5.62CPOE+4.51
- 37.4%Third-down rate41.5%
- 57.1%Red-zone TD rate55.5%
- 1.61Points / drive1.79
- 2.9%Turnover rate2.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NYJ lead 8–3 since 1999
NYJ have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.2 points. HOU are 2-8-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYJ–HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYJ | Q1 11:46 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 10:12 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYJ | Q1 8:35 | 16 | 67 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| HOU | Q1 0:08 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 3–0 |
| NYJ | Q2 13:20 | 3 | 12 | Punt | 3–0 |
| HOU | Q2 12:26 | 8 | 53 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| NYJ | Q2 7:29 | 10 | 78 | Touchdown | 10–0 |
| HOU | Q2 3:21 | 4 | 15 | Punt | 10–0 |
| NYJ | Q2 0:58 | 4 | 33 | End of half | 10–0 |
| NYJ | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 82 | Touchdown | 17–0 |
| HOU | Q3 7:35 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 17–0 |
| NYJ | Q3 6:21 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 17–0 |
| HOU | Q3 5:18 | 5 | 35 | Turnover on downs | 17–0 |
| NYJ | Q3 3:33 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 17–0 |
| HOU | Q3 0:54 | 6 | 4 | Punt | 17–0 |
| NYJ | Q4 14:28 | 4 | 21 | Opp touchdown | 17–7 |
| NYJ | Q4 12:18 | 4 | 85 | Touchdown | 24–7 |
| HOU | Q4 10:10 | 9 | 41 | Turnover | 24–7 |
| NYJ | Q4 7:20 | 10 | 66 | End of half | 24–7 |
Box score
Individual performances
Jets
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Sanchez | 18/31 | 272 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jones | 20 | 107 | 5.3 | 2 |
| Leon Washington | 15 | 60 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Brad Smith | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Mark Sanchez | 5 | 6 | 1.2 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dustin Keller | 4 | 7 | 94 | 0 |
| Jerricho Cotchery | 6 | 7 | 90 | 0 |
| Chansi Stuckey | 4 | 8 | 64 | 1 |
| Leon Washington | 4 | 6 | 24 | 0 |
| Ben Hartsock | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Brad Smith | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| David Clowney | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Schaub | 18/33 | 166 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Slaton | 9 | 17 | 1.9 | 0 |
| Chris Brown | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Matt Schaub | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Daniels | 4 | 8 | 44 | 0 |
| Andre Johnson | 4 | 7 | 35 | 0 |
| Steve Slaton | 3 | 6 | 35 | 0 |
| Andre Davis | 3 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| David Anderson | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| Chris Brown | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jacoby Jones | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Jets.
Half-point at risk
1.93%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.2%
Expected total
43.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.57
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.91



