Closing spread
PIT -3.5
Total
36.5
Model margin
+1.6est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Steelers
- OutTroy PolamaluSKnee· DNP
- DNPAaron SmithDENot Injury Related
- DNPHines WardWRNot Injury Related
- ProbableJames HarrisonLBIllness· DNP
- ProbableLawrence TimmonsLBAnkle· Full
- ProbableLimas SweedWRFoot· Full
- ProbableTyrone CarterSThigh· Full
Bengals
- OutAndre SmithTFoot· Out (Definitely Will Not Play)
- OutDavid JonesCBFoot· Limited
- QuestionableJonathan FaneneDTIllness· DNP
- QuestionableMichael JohnsonDEIllness· DNP
- QuestionableNate LivingsGKnee· Limited
- ProbableAntwan OdomDENot Injury Related· DNP
- ProbableCedric BensonRBAnkle· Full
- ProbableChris HenryWRQuadricep· Full
- ProbableJohnathan JosephCBAnkle· Full
Win probability
- Bengals
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.043EPA / play-0.019
- 44.8%Success rate42.9%
- +0.124EPA / dropback+0.038
- -0.083EPA / rush-0.082
- 10.2%Explosive rate8.5%
- +4.22CPOE-0.82
- 40.3%Third-down rate41.6%
- 55.0%Red-zone TD rate54.4%
- 1.83Points / drive1.65
- 2.2%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 41–16 since 1999
PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. CIN are 18-38-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 13:20 | 11 | 88 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| CIN | Q1 6:55 | 4 | 0 | Punt | 3–0 |
| PIT | Q1 5:28 | 8 | 64 | Touchdown | 10–0 |
| CIN | Q1 1:02 | 3 | -10 | Punt | 10–0 |
| PIT | Q2 14:47 | 4 | 55 | Field goal | 13–0 |
| CIN | Q2 12:44 | 12 | 57 | Punt | 13–0 |
| PIT | Q2 6:39 | 12 | 51 | Turnover on downs | 13–0 |
| CIN | Q2 1:06 | 7 | 44 | Field goal | 13–3 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 5 | Opp touchdown | 13–9 |
| PIT | Q3 13:35 | 3 | 6 | Missed field goal | 13–9 |
| CIN | Q3 11:48 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 13–9 |
| PIT | Q3 9:43 | 12 | 85 | Touchdown | 20–9 |
| CIN | Q3 3:00 | 7 | 35 | Missed field goal | 20–9 |
| PIT | Q4 14:51 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 20–9 |
| CIN | Q4 12:45 | 7 | 68 | Touchdown | 20–15 |
| PIT | Q4 9:14 | 6 | 10 | Punt | 20–15 |
| CIN | Q4 5:14 | 14 | 71 | Touchdown | 20–23 |
| PIT | Q4 0:14 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 20–23 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 22/31 | 276 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willie Parker | 25 | 93 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Wallace | 7 | 8 | 102 | 0 |
| Hines Ward | 4 | 5 | 82 | 0 |
| Willie Parker | 2 | 2 | 36 | 1 |
| Heath Miller | 5 | 6 | 20 | 0 |
| Santonio Holmes | 1 | 5 | 18 | 0 |
| Matt Spaeth | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Limas Sweed | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Palmer | 20/37 | 183 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Benson | 16 | 76 | 4.8 | 1 |
| Carson Palmer | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Johnson | 5 | 11 | 54 | 0 |
| Andre Caldwell | 6 | 9 | 52 | 1 |
| Laveranues Coles | 5 | 7 | 34 | 0 |
| Chris Henry | 1 | 3 | 19 | 0 |
| Brian Leonard | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Daniel Coats | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Cedric Benson | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
7.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
53.4%
Expected total
43.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.87
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.62



