2009 · Week 4

Final

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Josh Johnson

13·16

Commanders

Washington

QB Jason Campbell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 69°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

WAS -9.5

Total

36.5

Model margin

+3.2est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Buccaneers

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBuccaneers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Buccaneersedge mapCommanders
  • -0.156EPA / play-0.047
  • 36.1%Success rate41.0%
  • -0.138EPA / dropback+0.023
  • -0.188EPA / rush-0.168
  • 7.3%Explosive rate7.1%
  • -5.15CPOE+1.16
  • 33.0%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 61.0%Red-zone TD rate53.9%
  • 1.06Points / drive1.38
  • 3.4%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 9–9 since 1999

Meetings average 40.5 points. WAS are 9-7-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · playoffsWAS @ TB2320WAS
2024 · W1WAS @ TB2037TB
2021 · W10TB @ WAS1929WAS
2020 · playoffsTB @ WAS3123TB
2018 · W10WAS @ TB163WAS
2015 · W7TB @ WAS3031WAS
2014 · W11TB @ WAS277TB
2012 · W4WAS @ TB2422WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh Johnson13/2210611

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Cadillac Williams16774.80
Josh Johnson7415.90
Earnest Graham581.60
Clifton Smith231.50

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jason Campbell12/2217023

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis25983.90
Jason Campbell7202.90
Marcus Mason284.00
Ladell Betts1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Santana Moss24741
Chris Cooley510651
Ladell Betts33210
Mike Sellers11110
Antwaan Randle El0100
Malcolm Kelly0200
Fred Davis11-10

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +9.56.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Buccaneers.

Half-point at risk

3.09%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.6%

Expected total

44.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.62
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.90
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.20