Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2011 · Week 4

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Matt Hasselbeck

31·13

Browns

Cleveland

QB Colt McCoy

Cleveland Browns Stadium · outdoors · grass · 48°F · wind 24mph

Closing spread

CLE -1

Total

37.5

Model margin

+1.0est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapBrowns
  • -0.046EPA / play-0.091
  • 39.2%Success rate40.3%
  • +0.025EPA / dropback-0.059
  • -0.170EPA / rush-0.151
  • 8.7%Explosive rate5.4%
  • -1.91CPOE-4.62
  • 35.9%Third-down rate38.1%
  • 68.0%Red-zone TD rate56.5%
  • 1.51Points / drive1.09
  • 2.2%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TEN lead 11–7 since 1999

Meetings average 46.8 points. CLE are 9-8-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W14TEN @ CLE3129TEN
2023 · W3TEN @ CLE327CLE
2020 · W13CLE @ TEN4135CLE
2019 · W1TEN @ CLE4313TEN
2017 · W7TEN @ CLE129TEN
2016 · W6CLE @ TEN2628TEN
2015 · W2TEN @ CLE1428CLE
2014 · W5CLE @ TEN2928CLE

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck10/2022031
Jake Locker0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson231014.40
Matt Hasselbeck155.00
Javon Ringer441.00
Jamie Harper122.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jared Cook26931
Nate Washington24620
Lavelle Hawkins24380
Craig Stevens11121
Chris Johnson22110
Damian Williams1441

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Colt McCoy40/6135011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Peyton Hillis10464.60
Montario Hardesty7223.10
Colt McCoy4164.00
Armond Smith100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.3%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.6%2.8%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

2.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.7%

Expected total

42.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.50
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.99