Closing spread
BUF -11
Total
46
Model margin
-2.0est.
NYJ perspective
Push chance
1.4%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bills
- OutJordan PoyerSElbow· DNP
- QuestionableMatt MilanoLBOblique· Limited
- QuestionableSpencer BrownTAnkle· Limited
- DNPRodger SaffoldGNot injury related - resting player
- DNPStefon DiggsWRNot injury related - resting player
- LimitedDaQuan JonesDTNot injury related - resting player
Jets
- OutCorey DavisWRKnee· DNP
- QuestionableJames RobinsonRBKnee
Win probability
- Jets
- Bills
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.111EPA / play-0.086
- 49.0%Success rate39.1%
- +0.203EPA / dropback-0.081
- -0.064EPA / rush-0.093
- 9.3%Explosive rate8.2%
- +0.35CPOE-4.97
- 51.1%Third-down rate34.3%
- 61.8%Red-zone TD rate39.8%
- 2.48Points / drive1.41
- 2.5%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BUF lead 29–25 since 1999
BUF have won 5 straight. Meetings average 42.5 points. NYJ are 25-29 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BUF–NYJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 42 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| NYJ | Q1 14:11 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 12:21 | 14 | 67 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| NYJ | Q1 4:39 | 6 | 34 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| BUF | Q1 0:31 | 5 | 14 | Punt | 7–3 |
| NYJ | Q2 13:51 | 5 | 35 | Punt | 7–3 |
| BUF | Q2 10:42 | 9 | 93 | Touchdown | 14–3 |
| NYJ | Q2 6:30 | 13 | 75 | Touchdown | 14–10 |
| BUF | Q2 0:32 | 5 | 38 | Missed field goal | 14–10 |
| NYJ | Q3 15:00 | 14 | 57 | Turnover | 14–10 |
| BUF | Q3 6:21 | 2 | -7 | Turnover | 14–10 |
| NYJ | Q3 5:30 | 4 | 19 | Touchdown | 14–17 |
| BUF | Q3 4:03 | 11 | 42 | Field goal | 17–17 |
| NYJ | Q4 13:33 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 17–17 |
| BUF | Q4 12:34 | 8 | 19 | Punt | 17–17 |
| NYJ | Q4 7:53 | 12 | 81 | Field goal | 17–20 |
| BUF | Q4 1:43 | 5 | 9 | Turnover on downs | 17–20 |
| NYJ | Q4 0:24 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 17–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 18/34 | 205 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 2 |
| Devin Singletary | 8 | 24 | 3.0 | 0 |
| James Cook | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefon Diggs | 5 | 10 | 93 | 0 |
| Gabe Davis | 2 | 5 | 33 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 3 | 4 | 25 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 4 | 5 | 24 | 0 |
| James Cook | 2 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 |
| Jake Kumerow | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Nyheim Hines | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Jets
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Wilson | 18/25 | 154 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Carter | 12 | 76 | 6.3 | 1 |
| James Robinson | 13 | 48 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Zach Wilson | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 0 |
| Ty Johnson | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Garrett Wilson | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Wilson | 8 | 9 | 92 | 0 |
| C.J. Uzomah | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Denzel Mims | 1 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Tyler Conklin | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Braxton Berrios | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Jeff Smith | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| James Robinson | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Jets; negative favour Bills.
Half-point at risk
1.39%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
43.7%
Expected total
44.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.72
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-2.01



