Closing spread
BUF -8
Total
44
Model margin
+3.5est.
BUF perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Patriots
- QuestionableBrenden SchoolerSHip· Limited
- QuestionableJakobi MeyersWRShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableJalen MillsCBGroin· Limited
- QuestionableJonathan JonesCBChest· Limited
- QuestionableJonnu SmithTEConcussion· Limited
Bills
- DNPRodger SaffoldGNot injury related - resting player
- DNPStefon DiggsWRNot injury related - resting player
Win probability
- Bills
- Patriots
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.047EPA / play+0.111
- 41.1%Success rate49.0%
- -0.026EPA / dropback+0.203
- -0.082EPA / rush-0.064
- 10.3%Explosive rate9.3%
- +0.93CPOE+0.35
- 35.3%Third-down rate51.1%
- 56.0%Red-zone TD rate61.8%
- 1.54Points / drive2.48
- 2.3%Turnover rate2.5%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NE lead 40–16 since 1999
Meetings average 43.1 points. BUF are 21-32-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NE–BUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| NE | Q1 14:46 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 0–7 |
| BUF | Q1 13:09 | 5 | 1 | Punt | 0–7 |
| NE | Q1 10:29 | 9 | 74 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| BUF | Q1 5:45 | 13 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| NE | Q2 14:15 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 7–14 |
| BUF | Q2 12:44 | 6 | 13 | Punt | 7–14 |
| NE | Q2 9:16 | 9 | 74 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| BUF | Q2 3:45 | 11 | 57 | Turnover | 14–14 |
| NE | Q2 0:16 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 14–14 |
| NE | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 60 | Turnover | 14–14 |
| BUF | Q3 9:26 | 2 | 7 | Turnover | 14–14 |
| NE | Q3 8:34 | 3 | 5 | Field goal | 17–20 |
| BUF | Q3 7:06 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 17–21 |
| NE | Q3 6:53 | 5 | 14 | Punt | 17–21 |
| BUF | Q3 4:37 | 7 | 81 | Touchdown | 17–28 |
| NE | Q3 1:35 | 10 | 90 | Touchdown | 23–28 |
| BUF | Q4 11:37 | 5 | 75 | Touchdown | 23–35 |
| NE | Q4 8:51 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 23–35 |
| NE | Q4 8:22 | 7 | 23 | Turnover | 23–35 |
| BUF | Q4 4:52 | 5 | 10 | Punt | 23–35 |
| NE | Q4 3:25 | 3 | 9 | Turnover | 23–35 |
| BUF | Q4 2:42 | 2 | 11 | End of half | 23–35 |
Box score
Individual performances
Patriots
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Jones | 26/40 | 243 | 3 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 6 | 54 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Damien Harris | 13 | 48 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Mac Jones | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeVante Parker | 6 | 7 | 79 | 2 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 4 | 5 | 45 | 0 |
| Hunter Henry | 6 | 7 | 42 | 0 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 3 | 7 | 32 | 1 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 5 | 6 | 28 | 0 |
| Tyquan Thornton | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Damien Harris | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Nelson Agholor | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 19/31 | 254 | 3 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 9 | 45 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 7 | 29 | 4.1 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 9 | 16 | 1.8 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefon Diggs | 7 | 10 | 104 | 1 |
| John Brown | 1 | 1 | 42 | 1 |
| Gabe Davis | 3 | 10 | 39 | 0 |
| Khalil Shakir | 1 | 2 | 28 | 0 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 2 | 3 | 19 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 2 | 2 | 13 | 1 |
| James Cook | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Patriots.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
58.4%
Expected total
44.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.85
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+3.48



