2004 · Week 5 · Division
FinalLouisiana Superdome · dome · fieldturf
Closing spread
NO -3
Total
38.5
Model margin
+6.5est.
NO perspective
Push chance
7.3%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Saints
- Buccaneers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.072EPA / play-0.028
- 42.6%Success rate40.2%
- +0.008EPA / dropback+0.052
- -0.203EPA / rush-0.169
- 8.5%Explosive rate9.3%
- 37.9%Third-down rate33.4%
- 58.7%Red-zone TD rate60.5%
- 1.25Points / drive1.72
- 3.6%Turnover rate2.4%
- -0.089EPA / play allowed+0.061
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NO lead 28–23 since 1999
Meetings average 44.2 points. NO are 27-24 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TB–NO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 13 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TB | Q1 12:45 | 12 | 70 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| NO | Q1 7:05 | 3 | 13 | Punt | 3–0 |
| TB | Q1 5:08 | 7 | 28 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| NO | Q1 0:43 | 7 | 8 | Punt | 3–0 |
| TB | Q2 12:02 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 3–0 |
| NO | Q2 8:42 | 3 | 36 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| TB | Q2 7:18 | 5 | 46 | Field goal | 6–7 |
| NO | Q2 5:08 | 1 | -1 | Opp touchdown | 13–7 |
| NO | Q2 4:50 | 9 | 33 | Punt | 13–7 |
| TB | Q2 1:01 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 13–7 |
| TB | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 71 | Touchdown | 20–7 |
| NO | Q3 11:56 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 20–7 |
| TB | Q3 10:50 | 6 | 43 | Missed field goal | 20–7 |
| NO | Q3 7:41 | 9 | 68 | Touchdown | 20–13 |
| NO | Q3 2:51 | 1 | 3 | Touchdown | 20–14 |
| NO | Q3 2:46 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 20–14 |
| TB | Q3 2:46 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 20–14 |
| NO | Q3 0:33 | 2 | 3 | Turnover | 20–14 |
| NO | Q4 14:19 | 5 | 34 | Turnover | 20–14 |
| TB | Q4 11:29 | 6 | 7 | Punt | 20–14 |
| NO | Q4 8:01 | 7 | 40 | Field goal | 20–17 |
| TB | Q4 3:43 | 7 | 44 | End of half | 20–17 |
Box score
Individual performances
Buccaneers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Griese | 16/19 | 194 | 1 | 0 |
| Chris Simms | 5/8 | 68 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Pittman | 15 | 51 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Michael Clayton | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 |
| Brian Griese | 5 | -2 | -0.4 | 0 |
Saints
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Brooks | 11/23 | 106 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deuce McAllister | 21 | 102 | 4.9 | 0 |
| Aaron Stecker | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Aaron Brooks | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Saints; negative favour Buccaneers.
Half-point at risk
7.31%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
66.1%
Expected total
43.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.47
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+4.39
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+6.49



