2004 · Week 7

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jonathan Quinn

7·19

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Brian Griese

Raymond James Stadium · outdoors · grass · 80°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

TB -7

Total

32

Model margin

+4.9est.

TB perspective

Push chance

4.9%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Buccaneers
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Buccaneers winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapBuccaneers
  • -0.240EPA / play-0.072
  • 35.2%Success rate42.6%
  • -0.283EPA / dropback+0.008
  • -0.177EPA / rush-0.203
  • 6.8%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 25.7%Third-down rate37.9%
  • 43.9%Red-zone TD rate58.7%
  • 0.78Points / drive1.25
  • 3.4%Turnover rate3.6%
  • -0.102EPA / play allowed-0.089

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 10–10 since 1999

TB have won 2 straight. Meetings average 37.4 points. TB are 10-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W2CHI @ TB1727TB
2021 · W7CHI @ TB338TB
2020 · W5TB @ CHI1920CHI
2018 · W4TB @ CHI1048CHI
2017 · W2CHI @ TB729TB
2016 · W10CHI @ TB1036TB
2015 · W16CHI @ TB2621CHI
2014 · W12TB @ CHI1321CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Craig Krenzel9/196901
Jonathan Quinn5/94700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones13524.01
Anthony Thomas5173.40
Craig Krenzel144.00
Jonathan Quinn133.00

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brian Griese15/2316310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Pittman231094.71
Jamel White451.30
Brian Griese2-1-0.50
Michael Clayton1-4-4.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.5%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Buccaneers; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

4.93%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.1%

Expected total

42.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.15
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.26
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+4.89