2004 · Week 13 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

14·24

Bears

Chicago

QB Chad Hutchinson

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 45°F · wind 14mph

Closing spread

MIN -7

Total

40.5

Model margin

+0.2est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

4.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • +0.162EPA / play-0.240
  • 50.0%Success rate35.2%
  • +0.287EPA / dropback-0.283
  • -0.097EPA / rush-0.177
  • 10.7%Explosive rate6.8%
  • 52.5%Third-down rate25.7%
  • 64.5%Red-zone TD rate43.9%
  • 2.26Points / drive0.78
  • 2.0%Turnover rate3.4%
  • +0.107EPA / play allowed-0.102

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper23/3327923

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Onterrio Smith13796.10
Daunte Culpepper6508.30
Nate Burleson11010.00
Moe Williams133.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chad Hutchinson18/3021330

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Anthony Thomas15553.70
Thomas Jones15493.30
Bernard Berrian22613.00
Chad Hutchinson3144.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -72.7%4.4%2.9%7.3%7.4%2.9%4.4%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

4.38%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.5%

Expected total

45.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.63
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.24
  • Expected margin+0.18