2009 · Week 3 · Division

Final

Browns

Cleveland

QB Brady Quinn

3·34

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Joe Flacco

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · sportturf · 72°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

BAL -13.5

Total

38.5

Model margin

+6.2est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Browns

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsBrowns wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Brownsedge mapRavens
  • -0.168EPA / play+0.058
  • 35.2%Success rate44.3%
  • -0.266EPA / dropback+0.078
  • -0.069EPA / rush+0.031
  • 8.1%Explosive rate9.0%
  • -10.33CPOE+2.29
  • 32.5%Third-down rate41.4%
  • 42.9%Red-zone TD rate59.6%
  • 1.23Points / drive1.99
  • 3.1%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 39–15 since 1999

BAL have won 3 straight. Meetings average 40.6 points. BAL are 29-24-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11BAL @ CLE2316BAL
2025 · W2CLE @ BAL1741BAL
2024 · W18CLE @ BAL1035BAL
2024 · W8BAL @ CLE2429CLE
2023 · W10CLE @ BAL3331CLE
2023 · W4BAL @ CLE283BAL
2022 · W15BAL @ CLE313CLE
2022 · W7CLE @ BAL2023BAL

Box score

Individual performances

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Derek Anderson11/199203
Brady Quinn6/83401

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jerome Harrison16523.30
James Davis5102.00
Brady Quinn294.50

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Flacco25/3534210
Troy Smith1/2400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Willis McGahee7679.62
Ray Rice11484.41
Mark Clayton2157.50
Joe Flacco252.50
Matt Lawrence400.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Derrick Mason581181
Kelley Washington56660
Todd Heap44410
Mark Clayton36350
Ray Rice47270
L.J. Smith11260
Matt Lawrence1140
Willis McGahee0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +13.57.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.2%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Browns.

Half-point at risk

3.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.3%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.67
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.15